Christian Heritage Party of Canada
Media Release

The Vriend Case
April 6, 1998

Virend Decision Anti-Democratic
by: C.H.P. Leader
"The recent decision by the Supreme Court in the Vriend case is unconstitutional and demonstrates both the need to reform the high court, and the need for a higher level of appeal, says the Christian Heritage Party of Canada. Speaking from Northern BC, where he is on a speaking tour, the CHP Leader, Ron Gray denounced the decision as anti-democratic.

The right of the elected legislature to make laws, and the rights of a university and its students to choose what kind of community of scholars they want to study in, have been brushed aside in a decision which ignores both law and the constitution, Gray said.

The Interpretation Act, he pointed out, says every law and every court decision under that law must be governed by the law's preamble. The preamble to the Constitution, Canada's highest law, invokes the supremacy of God, but the court decision in Vriend ignores God's word in a case involving a Christian school, he emphasized.

A Christian institution has the absolute right to insist on Biblical standards of behaviour, Gray asserted. That right derives from both the Preamble and from the Charter's guarantee of freedom of religion.

In this decision the court has taken one more autocratic step towards re-defining 'marriage' in Canada. It is obliterating the definition which this nation has historically held, Gray said. That definition has traditionally limited spousal recognition to the legal union of one adult man with one adult woman. That definition limits number, gender, age and species.

If the Supreme Court, over-riding the legitimate authority of the legislatures, sweeps aside the limitation of gender, on what basis can we hope to continue to limit 'marriage' in terms of number, age or species? he asked. Will the court now open the door for polygamy and polyandry? For child marriage? For bestiality? The decision in Vriend offers no rational basis for the Court to so 'no' to anything.

By this decision, the Court has also usurped the authority of elected legislature. That is profoundly anti-democratic. Gray said his party is considering a policy that would advocate the right to appeal Supreme Court decision to the Governor-General in Council or to the House of Commons, in order to provide a final level of appeal that is accountable to the electorate. The Supreme Court, he pointed out, is unelected, and accountable to no one."

 

For further information:
C
all 905-788-2238
EDCHPCAN@netcom.ca
 

Page Tools:
Canada Family Action Coalition (CFAC) National Office
#204, 4080 - 23Street NE
Calgary, Alberta T2E 6W9
Phone: (403) 295-2159
Fax: (403) 291-2515
E-mail: info@familyaction.org
G
Clic ici pour une traduction automatisée de Google
Printer-Friendly Version of This Page
Email This Page
View CFAC's Legal Disclaimer
Download Adobe's Free PDF viewer

Sponsors





Interested in becoming a CFAC advertiser? Email us!

Questions or comments about this site may be sent directly to CFACat info@familyaction.org